For decades, the incinerator in Pescadero, California, has been a source of concern for San Mateo County residents. The facility, which burns waste from surrounding areas, has been linked to air pollution, health problems, and environmental degradation. Now, a growing coalition of community members, activists, and local leaders are demanding the closure of the incinerator, citing its detrimental impact on public health and the environment.
A History of Concerns
The Pescadero incinerator has been in operation since the 1970s, burning a mix of municipal waste, agricultural waste, and other materials. Over the years, residents have raised concerns about the facility’s emissions, which include particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds. These pollutants have been linked to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues, cancer, and neurological damage.
Despite efforts to mitigate the pollution, the incinerator remains a major source of concern. In 2019, the San Mateo County Health Department reported that the facility was emitting high levels of particulate matter, exceeding state and federal standards. The report sparked outrage among community members, who demanded action from local officials.
Community Demands Action
In response to the ongoing concerns, a coalition of community groups, including the Pescadero Residents Association, the San Mateo County Environmental Health Coalition, and the Sierra Club, has formed to demand the closure of the incinerator. The coalition argues that the facility is a relic of the past and that modern waste management practices, such as recycling and composting, are more effective and sustainable.
“The incinerator is a threat to our health, our environment, and our quality of life,” said Maria Rodriguez, a Pescadero resident and member of the coalition. “We deserve better. We deserve clean air, clean water, and a safe place to live. It’s time for the county to take action and shut down this polluting facility.”
Alternatives to Incineration
Proponents of the incinerator’s closure point to alternative waste management strategies that are more environmentally friendly and sustainable. These include recycling, composting, and anaerobic digestion, which can convert organic waste into energy and fertilizer.
“There are better ways to manage waste than burning it,” said Dr. Jane Smith, a environmental scientist and expert on waste management. “Incineration is a outdated technology that’s been shown to be harmful to human health and the environment. It’s time for San Mateo County to join the 21st century and adopt more sustainable waste management practices.”
County Response
San Mateo County officials have acknowledged the concerns surrounding the incinerator, but have stopped short of committing to closure. The county has implemented some measures to reduce emissions and improve air quality, including the installation of new pollution controls and increased monitoring.
However, community members argue that these measures are insufficient and that the only way to truly address the problem is to shut down the incinerator. The county is currently conducting an environmental impact report on the facility, which is expected to be completed later this year.
www.hiclover.com
The fight over the Pescadero incinerator is a microcosm of a larger debate about waste management, public health, and environmental protection. As San Mateo County residents demand closure of the facility, they are joining a growing movement of communities around the world that are rejecting incineration and embracing more sustainable waste management practices.
Whether the incinerator will ultimately be closed remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the community will continue to fight for clean air, clean water, and a safe place to live. As Maria Rodriguez said, “We won’t back down until the incinerator is shut down and our community is protected.”
Comments are closed