Incinerator Under Fire: Community Groups Pressure Princeton to Reconsider Waste Management Options
A growing chorus of concern from community groups and residents has put Princeton’s waste management practices under intense scrutiny, with many calling for a reevaluation of the town’s reliance on incineration. The Princeton incinerator, which has been in operation for decades, has been a source of controversy due to concerns over air pollution, health impacts, and environmental sustainability.
At the heart of the debate is the question of whether incineration remains a viable and responsible waste management strategy for the town. Community groups, including the Princeton Environmental Commission and the local chapter of the Sierra Club, argue that the incinerator poses significant risks to public health and the environment. They point to studies that have linked incineration to increased emissions of toxic pollutants, including particulate matter, heavy metals, and volatile organic compounds.
“These pollutants can have serious health impacts, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing medical conditions,” said Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a local resident and member of the Princeton Environmental Commission. “We urge the town to consider alternative waste management strategies that prioritize recycling, composting, and reduction of waste at the source.”
One of the primary concerns surrounding the incinerator is its proximity to residential areas and local schools. Community groups have expressed alarm over the potential health risks posed by the incinerator’s emissions, which can include toxic pollutants such as dioxins and furans. These pollutants have been linked to a range of health problems, including cancer, respiratory disease, and neurological damage.
In addition to health concerns, community groups are also highlighting the environmental impacts of incineration. The process of burning waste releases large quantities of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and methane, which contribute to climate change. Furthermore, incineration can also result in the production of toxic ash, which can contaminate soil and water if not properly managed.
In response to these concerns, community groups are pushing for the town to adopt more sustainable waste management practices. They propose a range of alternatives, including increased recycling and composting programs, as well as the implementation of “zero waste” policies that aim to minimize waste generation at the source.
“We believe that Princeton can do better,” said Sarah Johnson, a local resident and member of the Sierra Club. “By prioritizing recycling, composting, and reduction of waste, we can reduce our reliance on incineration and create a more sustainable future for our community.”
The town of Princeton has responded to these concerns by launching a review of its waste management practices. Officials have committed to exploring alternative strategies and engaging with community groups to develop a more sustainable waste management plan.
While the outcome of this review is still uncertain, community groups remain optimistic that the town will ultimately choose to abandon incineration in favor of more sustainable alternatives. As one resident noted, “This is an opportunity for Princeton to lead by example and demonstrate its commitment to environmental sustainability and public health. We hope that the town will seize this opportunity and create a better future for our community.”
What You Can Do
- Contact your local representatives to express your concerns about the incinerator and urge them to support more sustainable waste management practices.
- Participate in community forums and public meetings to learn more about the town’s waste management plans and provide feedback.
- Reduce your own waste generation by recycling, composting, and avoiding single-use plastics.
- Support local organizations and businesses that prioritize sustainability and environmental responsibility.
Together, we can create a more sustainable future for Princeton and set an example for other communities to follow.

Comments are closed