The Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator, located in northeastern Pennsylvania, has been a source of controversy and concern for local residents and environmental groups for decades. The facility, which burns waste to produce energy, has a troubled past marked by repeated violations of environmental regulations, health problems, and community outcry. As the incinerator’s future hangs in the balance, it’s essential to examine its history and the implications of its continued operation.

A History of Non-Compliance

The Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator has been in operation since the 1980s, and from its early days, it has struggled to meet environmental standards. The facility has been cited for numerous violations of the Clean Air Act, including excessive emissions of particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and other pollutants. In 2015, the incinerator was fined $1.5 million by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for violating emissions standards.

In addition to air pollution, the incinerator has also been linked to water pollution. The facility’s ash disposal practices have raised concerns about contamination of local waterways, including the Lackawanna River. In 2019, a study found high levels of toxic chemicals, including dioxins and furans, in the river’s sediment near the incinerator.

Health Impacts

The Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator’s emissions have been linked to a range of health problems, including respiratory diseases, cancer, and neurological disorders. A 2018 study published in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology found that residents living near the incinerator had higher rates of asthma, lung cancer, and other health problems compared to those living farther away.

Local residents have long reported health issues, including foul odors, soot-covered homes, and respiratory problems. The incinerator’s operators have disputed these claims, but the evidence suggests that the facility’s emissions are having a significant impact on public health.

Community Resistance

The Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator has faced intense community resistance over the years. Local residents, environmental groups, and elected officials have rallied against the facility, calling for its closure or significant reforms. In 2020, the Lackawanna County Council passed a resolution urging the DEP to revoke the incinerator’s operating permit.

Despite this opposition, the incinerator’s operators have continued to push for its continued operation. In 2022, the company announced plans to upgrade the facility, which would allow it to burn even more waste and generate more energy. However, this plan has been met with fierce resistance from local residents, who argue that it would only exacerbate the facility’s environmental and health problems.

An Uncertain Future

The Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator’s future is uncertain, with its operating permit set to expire in 2025. The DEP has announced plans to review the facility’s application for renewal, but it’s unclear whether the agency will grant the permit or impose significant reforms.

As the community awaits the DEP’s decision, local residents and environmental groups are continuing to push for the incinerator’s closure. They argue that the facility’s troubled past and ongoing health and environmental problems make it a liability that can no longer be tolerated.

In conclusion, the Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator’s history of non-compliance, health impacts, and community resistance make it a burning issue that demands attention and action. As the facility’s future hangs in the balance, it’s essential that policymakers and regulators prioritize the health and well-being of local residents and the environment, and consider alternative, more sustainable solutions for managing waste in northeastern Pennsylvania.

What You Can Do:

  • Contact your local representatives and express your concerns about the Lackawanna Throop Waste Incinerator.
  • Join local environmental groups and community organizations to stay informed and get involved in the fight against the incinerator.
  • Support alternative waste management solutions, such as recycling and composting, that prioritize sustainability and public health.

Categories:

Comments are closed